We’ve examined several key competitors below, highlighting what works in each before comparing them with our own app, to show you why ours is one of the very best dating apps around today.
Features: Browse profiles based on criteria such as appearance, interests and job type.
This issue is eliminated in the Elite Singles app, as we allow our users to set their area themselves.
Just because you may live in a remote location, it doesn’t mean you won’t be able to find your perfect match!
The app provides users with potential matches based on who they have crossed paths with in the past, with the idea being that singles will have something in common right from the offset.
The Elite Singles approach: The range for potential matches is only 250 meters, which can severely limit your dating options, especially if you live in a neighbourhood that doesn’t contain many singles your own age, or if you live outside the city.
The Elite Singles approach: POF’s average user age is between 18 and 35, which means a much lower chance of finding a match for more mature users.
Also, because Plentyof Fish is free, it has to include adverts in its service, which means a less streamlined, clunkier interface for the user.If you’re looking for a longer lasting and more genuine romantic relationship, Elite Singles’ personality test, matching algorithm and general user base is by far the more sensible option.Also, the best dating apps provide cross-platform functionality, which Tinder (and several others on this list) do not.Features: Tinder allows users to browse a variety of singles in their area via simplistic profiles that feature several photos and a brief bio.By either swiping left or right on a user’s profile picture to indicate interest (or lack of), users find matches primarily based on physical attraction.Features: e Harmony follows a similar format to Elite Singles, in that singles signing up will fill out a personality test that is then used to match them to individuals with similar interests and values.